Bravenet Guestmap
Showing posts with label COVID. Show all posts
Showing posts with label COVID. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 24, 2024
Breaking, Federal Judge in Canada (The Honourable Mr. Justice Mosley), stunningly, after so long, shows there is a God & there still is justice (that Madame Justice blindfolds do work) ruled that Canadian Government’s use of the Emergencies Act during Trucker Convoy in Ottawa was unlawful & ultra vires, acting beyond the granted scope of the authority or power; TAMPON man Trudeau to appeal DR. PAUL ALEXANDER JAN 23
https://www.jccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024-01-23-T-306-22-T-316-22-T-347-22-T-382-22-Reasons-FINAL.pdf
That the Canadian Government’s use of the Emergencies Act during the Trucker Convoy in Ottawa was indeed unlawful & ultra vires, and that certain of its measures such as freezing of bank accounts, were unconstitutional. This included arresting some and trying to arrest me. Coming after Hodkinson and myself…no doubt the tampon MENSTRUATING man himself, Justin Trudeau will appeal.
Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
© 2024 Paul
150 South 8th Street, Unit 170, Lewiston, NY 14092
'Why Did HHS "Partner" with DOD?'
Informative substack by SASHA LATYPOVA, originator Debbie Lerman, full disclosure, I know Deb. excellent person, dedicated soldier in this, wants answers about the fake COVID pandemic and the deadly mRNA gene based vaccines. Support Sasha, and Deb; answer is that OWS was a military operation, 100%; I was there, people I dealt with were outside of illicit loop DR. PAUL ALEXANDER JAN 23
Due Diligence and Art
Why Did HHS "Partner" with DOD?
Here is a key piece of legal history examined by Debbie Lerman. She is also now on Substack, please subscribe to her Debbie Lerman’s Substack. I will be quoting from Part 2 of the series of articles on Brownstone website here, Part 1 is linked to it…
Read more
4 days ago · 111 likes · 78 comments · Sasha Latypova
They did their jobs. Senior scientists were all military, Army, NAVY.
‘Here is a key piece of legal history examined by Debbie Lerman. She is also now on Substack, please subscribe to her Debbie Lerman’s Substack. I will be quoting from Part 2 of the series of articles on Brownstone website here, Part 1 is linked to it.
Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Upgrade to paid
As you may recall, Operation Warp Speed was advertised as a “partnership” between HHS and DOD:
Due Diligence and Art is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Upgrade to paid
“One Government Entity” was an odd choice of words. We have separate branches of government and separate federal agencies for many reasons. Importantly, this was envisioned by the framers as a system where federal agencies’ authorities are limited, and where different branches of government serve as checks or limits to each other. All those reasons apparently could be disregarded seemingly in an instant, under a manufactured “emergency”.
At the time of the OWS announcement I thought it was odd that there was a need to bring DOD into this activity at all. What do they know about making drugs? Close to nothing. What do they know about pharmacy distribution chain in the US (which is fast, traceable, regulated by the states, very experienced, and is already established everywhere) - also not much. I later learned about the real role of the DOD in the “covid” mass murder exercise. I wrote many articles about it here, here and here, and made several presentations on this topic here and here.
While it is now very clear that the DOD has been leading and funding the mass killing of civilians and own service members (to be replaced by imported mercenaries via southern border trafficking), to date, the reasons for the DOD-HHS partnerships remained vague. We knew the criminals needed the fig leaf of a faked “public health emergency” to issue the PREP Act declarations and EUAs (here, here and here), but the topic of the “partnership” remained largely unelucidated.
Debbie Lerman, a journalist writing for Brownstone Institute, did some outstanding digging and analysis to uncover a really important piece of evidence of a carefully pre-planned, coordinated attack by the US federal agencies working in concert. It appears that one of the main reasons this “partnering” needed to happen was the use of Other Transaction Authority (OTA). It turns out, quite reasonably, different federal agencies have different scope of the OTAs. The scope of HHS’s OTA did not permit manufacturing pharmaceuticals at scale, especially not before satisfying regulatory requirements for safety.
To summarize the predicament of Other Transaction Authority/Agreements with respect to civilian authorities, in general, and Covid mRNA vaccines, in particular:
OTA was written and codified as a way for the military to acquire weapons and other necessary systems and equipment without a lot of bureaucratic red tape. It covers research and development, prototypes, and subsequent manufacturing.
The only OTA for a public health agency is for the HHS and it only covers Research & Development, not prototypes or manufacturing.
Even the R&D OTA given to the HHS still requires products to be manufactured “in a form that satisfies the regulatory requirements” for drug and vaccine safety.
In other words: There is no way HHS could have used its very limited OTA to sign contracts for hundreds of millions of novel medical products.
So what did HHS do?
As the Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted in its July 2021 report on “Covid-19 Contracting:” HHS “partnered” with DoD to “leverage DoD’s OTA authorities…which HHS lacked.” (p. 24)
Acting as separate federal agencies within the limits of their authorities, neither HHS nor DOD would have been able to order 100 million doses of unapproved, untested, previously thoroughly failed “vaccine”. So they “partnered” in order to break the constraints of their authorities:
While the HHS OTA requires adherence to extensive development and manufacturing regulations, the OTA pathway for the DoD to develop medical countermeasures requires only “FDA licensure.”
Thus, using DoD Other Transaction Authorities, it would theoretically be possible to bypass any safety regulations – depending on the requirements for FDA licensing of an OTA-generated product. As we will see, in the case of the Covid mRNA vaccines, Emergency Use Authorization was granted, requiring no legal safety oversight at all.
Another very useful insight from Debbie on EUA Countermeasures law is that the utilization of EUA in this “partnering” scheme is evidence in itself that the relevant US Government officials never believed covid was a viral pandemic. They knew it was a chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) agent or combination of such agents. That is because the EUA law does not include naturally occurring viral outbreaks (if you believe those exist in modern sanitary conditions, I don’t). The fact that the senior government executives lied by pumping mass propaganda about the “wet market zoonotic jump”, utilizing massive network of DHS and intelligence contractors to censor any social media mention to the contrary, prosecuting and smearing any credentialed person who pointed to the holes in their narrative, performing endless clown-show Congressional hearings about whether it was a zoonotic jump or a Wuhan leak, and currently continue to pretend covid was a viral pandemic only points to one thing - this attack being perpetuated by those who lie and cover it up, i.e. the US Government officials themselves:
The wording of the EUA law underscores the fact that it was intended for use in situations involving weapons of mass destruction. Here are the 4 situations in which EUA can be issued:
a determination by the Secretary of Homeland Security that there is a domestic emergency, or a significant potential for a domestic emergency, involving a heightened risk of attack with a biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear agent or agents;
a determination by the Secretary of Defense that there is a military emergency, or a significant potential for a military emergency, involving a heightened risk to United States military forces, including personnel operating under the authority of Title 10 or Title 50, of attack with—
a biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear agent or agents; or
an agent or agents that may cause, or are otherwise associated with, an imminently life-threatening and specific risk to United States military forces;
a determination by the Secretary that there is a public health emergency, or a significant potential for a public health emergency, that affects, or has a significant potential to affect, national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad, and that involves a biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear agent or agents, or a disease or condition that may be attributable to such agent or agents; or
the identification of a material threat pursuant to section 319F–2 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 247d–6b] sufficient to affect national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad.
Nowhere in these four situations is there any mention of a naturally occurring epidemic, pandemic, or any other kind of public health situation that is not caused by “biological, chemical, radiological or nuclear agent/s.”
On What Legal Basis was EUA Issued for Covid mRNA Vaccines?
It would seem, based on the laws regarding EUA, that none of the four possible situations described in the law could be applied to a product intended to prevent or treat a disease caused by a naturally occurring pathogen.
Nevertheless, this law was used to authorize the mRNA Covid vaccines.
Given the four choices listed in the EUA law, the one that was used for Covid “countermeasures” was:
“C) a determination by the Secretary that there is a public health emergency, or a significant potential for a public health emergency, that affects, or has a significant potential to affect, national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad, and that involves a biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear agent or agents, or a disease or condition that may be attributable to such agent or agents.”
When applied specifically to Covid, this is how it was worded:
“the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determined that there is a public health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad, and that involves the virus that causes Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)…”
There is no doubt here that “the virus that causes COVID-19” is deemed to be the equivalent of “a biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear agent or agents.”
It is also important to note that the EUA “determination of a public health emergency” is completely separate from, and not in any way reliant on, any other public health emergency declarations, like the ones that were made by the WHO, the US government, and the President at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic.
So even when the WHO, the US government, and the President declare that the pandemic is over, there can still be Emergency Use Authorization if the HHS Secretary continues to claim that the situation described in section C) exists.
Katherine Watt on how to prosecute this using the laws as material facts:
One possible scenario includes motions for summary judgment, asking the federal judges to review the evidence and arguments presented, and rule that there is no dispute as to material facts: that the evidence against the US Government is so clear, the cases don’t need to move to trial.
Plaintiffs will be arguing that the US Government has criminally built an illegitimate statutory, regulatory and executive authority framework to theoretically de-criminalize acts of terrorism and use of chemical and biological weapons against the American people when committed by the US Government itself through the Department of Defense behind the false front of ‘public health.’
And that starting in January 2020, named officials within the US Government actually used those illegitimate legal frameworks to turn real bioweapons on the people.
The US Government’s primary defense will — in all likelihood — be based on its arguments that everything done by defendants was authorized by Congress and US presidents through the same statutes, regulations and executive orders.
Which means that on the basic issues of material fact, there is no dispute.
The only questions are the moral and legal questions: can a government lawfully kill off its own people?
Judges can and do summarily grant relief to plaintiffs on the basis of solid pleadings, early discovery and lack of dispute over material facts.
The cognitive mind-fuckery the globalists set up is that there’s usually a difference between the facts and the law during litigation.
But in this case, the material facts are the laws.
Art for today: Angels and demons, 16x20.
Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Upgrade to paid
Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack.
© 2024 Paul
150 South 8th Street, Unit 170, Lewiston, NY 14092
Saturday, January 20, 2024
I told you COVID
I told you COVID, or whatever this is or was (& I not convinced this was what we were dealing with), but something they created was lose years before 2020; now HASLAM "SARS2 was in a UNC freezer back
in 2018, & this is way bigger that Baric" para; I guarantee you will learn that this was always corculating, BENIGN, low level, & PCR fraud process was used to DETECT something ALWAYS there; topple 45
DR. PAUL ALEXANDER
JAN 19
The history, the script will be rewritten and revised…all we think we know will come undone…the truth is coming…and people must hang for this COVID…for this mRNA technology and vaccine.
they detected something with PCR (over-cycled beyond 24 amplifications) that was always there, circulating…Diamond Princess told us this…aircraft carriers told us this, Charles and Theodore….Kidd…they knew it was there for they released it (intent or not); this COVID was never ever a pandemic, maybe Spanish Flu 1918 was never a pandemic, COVID was a full fledged lie! 100% of it…every aspect of it and the mRNA technology people, the vaccine mRNA makers are the real criminals in this…they caused this disaster, the deaths, with their death tool…this was murder in the first! and we capped the murder off with the deadly medical management of our precious peoples with isolation, propofol and midazolam sedation, dehydration, DNR, Remdesivir that killed kidneys, livers, and the deadly ventilator that blew up sick lungs…the fear…our medical response killed most!
Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Upgrade to paid
Hang them all who did this!
and they cashed in…fascinating…
Reverse engineering the origins of SARS-CoV-2
SARS2 was in a UNC freezer back in 2018
If you closely read what I tried to write, you are probably shocked at this one line from a recent 1,400 page FOIA. Dr Ralph Baric (RB) in 2018 “has already generated SARS-like chimeras…of bat viruses…which are 20% different than epidemic strains.” SARS2 was…
Read more
12 hours ago · 6 likes · Jim Haslam
‘If you closely read what I tried to write, you are probably shocked at this one line from a recent 1,400 page FOIA. Dr Ralph Baric (RB) in 2018 “has already generated SARS-like chimeras…of bat viruses…which are 20% different than epidemic strains.”
SARS2 was 22% different than epidemic strains. To put it bluntly, a bat virus ~2% different from SARS2 was in a UNC freezer, in early 2018. The parameter was always on Baric’s mind starting in 2015:
A coronavirus expert, Baric said if the viruses were too distantly related to SARS — more than 25% different — they would not be able to make a hybrid that would infect human cells. “Not all SARS-like coronaviruses have the inherent potential to replicate in mammalian cells and replicate in human cells.”
Baric was always looking for a Chinese bat sample no “more than 25 percent different” than pandemic strains like SARS1. The RaTG13 sample, collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2013, had a spike that was exactly 24.6% off SARS1. We discussed this in Part 6 and Part 7, but if you need a reminder:
Just six months earlier, in the summer of 2019, Daszak and Baric’s “hypothesis” was submitted for NIAID’s CREID project. They were seeking viruses less than 25% different from SARS1. The circulating SARS2 was 22% different from SARS1, so mission accomplished, because they found what they had created!
To put Baric’s freezer in perspective, the nearest known sample to SARS2 was RaTG13 at 4% different. But Baric had a bat virus called “293” and “HK3” that was even closer!
2nd bombshell
Dr Danielle Anderson’s role in the DARPA Defuse document was not clear, but Duke was responsible for the bat vaccine trials in Wuhan. The DARPA Defuse draft was much more explicit, Dani “will lead the animal studies.”
In 2019, Dani was a full time bat immunologist inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology. In 2021, she told Bloomberg she was working on Ebola at the BSL4, but she never studied Ebola. In November 2019, Dani left Wuhan without reason and never disclosed her central role in the DARPA Defuse proposal. On Jan 10, 2020, her boss Dr Linfa Wang resigned as Duke’s EID director.
3rd bombshell
Dr. Valentin Bruttel
led a restriction enzyme crusade that was covered by theEconomist.
The preprint shows that restriction sites for two popular restriction enzymes—bsaI and bsmbI—are strikingly evenly spaced in SARS2’s genome. In fact, the authors say, the spacing of these sites is so unusual that it suggests the work of human hands. In other words, they are claiming that SARS2 is a product of laboratory engineering.
Those human hands were Dr Baric’s. Inside SARS2 are six neatly spaced “cDNA pieces linked by unique restriction endonuclease (biological welds) for full length genome assembly.” He also used UNC’s exclusive human airway epithelial cells to create SARS2, in Chapel Hill, NC.
Notice RaTG13 & Banal are <5% off SARS2 and the exclusive HAE
The Bruttel preprint referenced the UNC reverse genetic system (cDNA), but not the Chinese junk used in Wuhan (BAC). In 2017, Baric published a reverse genetic system outlining a ”seamless assembly of all (six) fragments” into a full length genome like SARS2. Baric gave a presentation on the assembly process and said it was like playing with “tinker toys.”
Fellow German scientists have not approved Bruttel’s preprint, but the latest FOIA proved his scientific point. In the DARPA Defuse draft, UNC planned to order BsmBI to assemble SARS2, in 2018! The same BsmBI sites are found in SARS2 at the same location.
Page 672 of FOIA
Congratulations to Dr Richard H. Ebright for reading my hit piece, then blocking everyone on Twitter, while calling this evidence the smoking gun for a lab construct!
Image
via Ebright
SARS2 required a $186M lab to create a novel coronavirus. There were nearly 50 UNC scientists listed on a typical reverse genetic paper. A lot of lab leak ‘scientist’ conflate the ease of assembling a genome already circulating in humans, versus the creation of a novel coronavirus never seen in nature. In other words, no other lab could mail order SARS2 in 2019, but any lab could isolate the human virus in 2020.
In 2020, Baric covered his biological tracks by using very different restriction sites to assemble the SARS2 genome. Remember when the US military asked Baric, “are there any restriction sites in this strain…suggesting it is engineered?”
Baric replied, “no, there is absolutely no evidence that this virus is bioengineered.”
4th bombshell
Baric must have been blinded by the beauty of his own creation, because he missed those obvious restriction sites, along with the infamous furin cleavage site!
It was the same SARS2 furin cleavage site that he proposed to insert at the S1/S2 border (R667) of a novel coronavirus like SARS2.
The highlighted parts were deleted from the Defuse draft
This was the same furin cleavage site that Baric forgot to mention, during a one hour presentation to Congressional staff in Washington D.C.
5th bombshell
Dr Tim Sheahan probably created SARS2 in his Chapel Hill, NC office. He described a division of labor at the UNC lab, with a large team dedicated to each part of the complicated assembly process.
Tim was Baric Jr and anointed a “genetics expert.” On Dec 11, 2019, he shared a screenshot of his monitor.
Image
BatSRBD was the UNC consensus sequence paper from 2008. “We designed a consensus Bat-SCoV genome and replaced the Bat-SCoV Spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) with the SARS-CoV RBD (Bat-SRBD).”
My Part 1 title was a brilliant play on words that nobody understood?
SARS2 was a consensus sequence of various genomes collected over the past decade. These included RaTG13, Laos Banal, Thailand, Cambodia, etc. In 2018, Baric bragged about “several” bat samples “with pandemic potential” stored in his Chapel Hill, NC freezer.
Two of those 2018 viruses were called “293” and “HK3.” They will both become the second most debated genome in human history, behind SARS2.
In Baric’s last interview, before DARPA Defuse leaked in September 2021, he claimed to have never sent “chimeric virus sequence, clones, or viruses” to Wuhan. Fauci then gave him $65M to shut up, because this story is much bigger than Dr Ralph Baric.
Postscript
Many thanks to Gumby for releasing the FOIA, since USRTK was sitting on this explosive information for one month. To their credit, it was a ninja FOIA move to get the DARPA Defuse draft from USGS emails, since UNC was stonewalling for good reason.’
Dr. Paul Alexander from Alexander COVID News
SAGE HANA'S best, this is maybe the best substack thus far! 'Literal Nightmare Fuel Friday: Gene Editing Experiments and Kids on Islands and stop visiting me, Vision Fairy, it's too much'; look, I am
a small person in the mix, I think; my dog, day one was just justice and right vs wrong, met good people, yet most BAD people in COVID; want wrong doers to pay! SAGE now has 'I had a dream momement'
DR. PAUL ALEXANDER
JAN 19
SAGE is like an oracle of sorts…full respect….I don’t know them…others here too…I consider myself a baby in the mix…I know many leeching off of pain…and we are separating wheat from chaff slowly…but there are good soldiers here too…some scared, but we need them in the battle; we must not stop and I will not stop! I will lose my life first for it matters for something…wrong was done in COVID and I know its a polictical battle more; its not cut and dry! we have ot be careful.
But because I fight alongside folk like JJ, Yeadon, SAGE, Torma, Hodkinson…people who wage differently yet want same thing…
I love this one SAGE…we are not friends so to speak, but I like your work…smart…angry…driven….bit psychotic yet I am too….we have to be…as we deal with sociopaths and killers even among our groups…all I seek is respect as I stay in the octagon…I cannot step back and I am willing to sleep with the devil, the least deadly one (IMO and it could be wrong) to help fix something for I know cant fix all…but a soldier in this I am, I have nothing to lose…I lost it all when I started 4 years ago…I am starting over…but from here.
Great work here…I just ask you to be calm. We are in this battle and I may never know you but on same team.
I love ‘the dream’…I agree with most of it. Just envious that you had it and not me…
Malone put me out there to take threats on my life and family….he knew what he did one day in media, he put a mark on me…it horrified me…frightened me…I then knew the twisted animal I was dealing with…but he bumped into me…I ain’t no one he has ever dealt with…he is learning.
Sage’s Newsletter
Literal Nightmare Fuel Friday: Gene Editing Experiments and Kids on Islands and stop visiting me, Vision Fairy, it's too much
Section 1: The Dream I just had a dream. In this dream I was parachuted into a loft-restaurant-apartment with a beautiful woman behind the bar. I knew that this woman was dead. But she was alive for the sake of the dream. She was busy, remote, and made herself scarce…
Read more
an hour ago · 20 likes · 10 comments · Sage Hana
‘Section 1: The Dream
I just had a dream.
In this dream I was parachuted into a loft-restaurant-apartment with a beautiful woman behind the bar.
I knew that this woman was dead.
But she was alive for the sake of the dream. She was busy, remote, and made herself scarce.
She had a small team of youngs.
A very interesting young man with extremely unique facial features was explaining things to me.
The woman was in my lucid dreaming mind a bit like a younger Mae Brussels, and she was most definitely dead. Like Lawrence Dunegan, a ghost explaining your life in the Day Tapes.
The young man told me about gene editing, pedophilia, and children.
I thought of Hawaii when I woke up.
All those kids disappeared.
Burned alive? Spirited away for human trafficking?
It occurs to me.
The Human Trafficking is about more than pedophilia although I suspect that is also way part of the deal.
I think there are some poor kids out there who are being medically experimented upon by some Satanic hooooman lizard creatures.
The Grapes of Maui
SAGE HANA
·
AUGUST 27, 2023
by Buckminister It’s not like some Grapes of Wrath California shantytown burnt to the ground in the 30's where no one had a clue as to who was there. Every single person in Maui was tracked, traced, geolocated and under constant 24-7 monitoring from a multitude of sources, as we all are.
Read full story
Reprinted here as it is archived and paywalled. So…here you go.
by Buckminister
It’s not like some Grapes of Wrath California shantytown burnt to the ground in the 30's where no one had a clue as to who was there. Every single person in Maui was tracked, traced, geolocated and under constant 24-7 monitoring from a multitude of sources, as we all are.
The vax status, drivers License, car registration, employment status, voter registration, school district registration for children, or home schooling status, military status, social security benefits, social network (Facebook, etc) affiliations, including all social media (browsing history/ purchase history Amazon etc.), arrest records, court records, medical records, tax records (both federal and state) - all and more was known about each and every individual in Lahaina.
They were murdered, deliberately, in the most inhumane, horrible ways imaginable. They were not "unknowns", they are not "missing". They were living men, women and children who were ruled expendable. The blatant and outrageously absurd falsehood that there are "missing persons" at all is a dead giveaway we are staring down the barrel of a cruel sadistic hoax- a massive ritual mockery of our own collective awareness.
Amy Sukwan echoes here:
I find it amazing that government officials simultaneously claim incompetence and omnipotence, but that seems to be what I am looking at here. Somehow FEMA was able to survey all of these structures but isn’t able to come up with a missing persons list. I was under the impression that Hawaii was a US state. Wouldn’t a lot of these houses have had street addresses and mailboxes and postal workers delivering mail to them? Wouldn’t USPS have mail carriers on their route who have a good idea of who lives there? I’d bet that some of these people even had driver’s licenses and ID cards from the Hawaii DMV and of course those school registrations as mentioned for the children. I mean some of them might have fled the state or whatever, but normally when your home burns down, well, you don’t have anywhere out of state to go. Those staying with friends and family would definitely be applying for disaster assistance if they are alive and able to do so. Even if all identification was lost in the fire I’d assume that they would remember their name and address and other pertinent and easily verifiable details.
I think the elites might have gone a bridge too far with this one. I stayed at this exact hotel in 2009. Ugh.
Buckminister continues.
Like I said previously this attack was done out in the open in order to terrify us - the message being we can do something so incomprehensibly horrible - and do it right in front of everyone- and no one will say a fucking word. Everyone who speaks is owned, they want us to see that too.
I suspect the crime includes compromised individuals who are presenting themselves as survivors who were either bought into protection to shill a particular version of the story or literal imposters who never set foot in Lahaina who are part of the op to cover the story and misdirect. I strongly suspect based on the basic info available to anyone looking that the death toll is MUCH higher, they have no problem burning children alive alone in their homes why would we not realize they would of course have zero problem completely erasing the evidence that people even existed.
Closing thoughts from moi:
They are not going to stop.
In 1969, “everything is in place and nothing can stop us now.”
What happened in 2020 was so long planned and so audacious and so massive in scope that there is no way no how that it was a Dolts Botching Shit one off and we’ll do better moving forwards.
The Rockefellers All the Way Down seem to be moving briskly now.
A timetable to keep.
They are using all of your Gleaming Heroes and will humiliate them one at a time.
They are creating Nazi Brownshirts out of Hawaii cops.
Dear Hawaiian Cops…you know what is up. You have to know.
These are your people.
These are your very own people.
Just like the patients slotted for murder via sterile sounding “Hospital Protocols”, yes?
This one ain’t that sterile.
We see what happened here.
The weight of history is upon you.
Do you understand this?
We are at the end of Rosemary’s Baby right now and lots of people are picking up that Satan Baby and cuddling.
Section 2, Medical Experimentation on the Powerless
Remember Fauci’s book which RFK immediately seemed to forget about.
Remember when I wrote about Hilary Kaprowski, the polio “vaccine” guy and his medical experimentation?
The film interviews many still alive from the region. The residents were mandated to be test subjects.
Oral Polio Vaccines Being Administered
Conducting the experiments from on high was Hilary Koprowski, an ambitious Polish virologist and immunologist embroiled in something of a cooperative race with Jonas Salk and Albert Sabin to find a vaccine for polio, using monkey tissue as a culture for the virus.
Koprowski is alleged to have cultured the polio vaccines in the minced up kidneys of chimpanzees, and not rhesus monkeys, which were supposedly “safer”. He denied it, but the film interviews people who worked at the research labs and shows pictures of some of the alleged 600 chimps, all killed, and it’s pretty damning.
Did I mention that some of the chimps were drugged and dissected alive for their blood and kidneys and then “thrown away”. (Did they go ahead and kill them first at least, or just toss them alive into receptacles or graves?)
Did I mention that the map of the emergence of AIDS overlays almost exactly with the oral polio testing regions?
Did I mention that Koprowski had previously experimented with his oral polio vaccines on 20-handicapped children in New York?
Again, is there something necessarily sociopathic needed to perform this type of study? And testing your experimental drugs on handicapped children, for which Koprowsky was given a finger wagging apparently.
They target kids, powerless kids, and run their plans.
The colonial aspect of going to Africa reminds me of RFK, Jr. discussing Bill Gates surreptitiously testing out his sterilizing tetanus shots on Kenyan women.
Remember the modern day Pharm exec saying the quiet part out loud into a microphone, “we won’t know until we test it (Covid vaccines) out on the public”.
Again. We are all just hapless test subjects in some bizarre experiment which they keep framing as “public health”.
Still here?
Let’s keep going.
Let’s keep trekking across that river.
Thank you, baba, for sending me this.
I will have a plea at the end of this post.
Never Again Is Now
‘Follow the Science’ -The Path to undo History
Democracy and Human Rights are considered ‘mutually constitutive’. The USA represent the first example of a constitutional Republic founded on the principle of Human Rights. Science, on the other hand, is said to be “an institution congenial to democracy…
Read more
5 days ago · 17 likes · 6 comments · Uwe Alschner
Nuremberg Principles and Human Rights
Even though after World War II and the Holocaust, the concept of “eugenics” was discredited (in part due to the genocide and other crimes committed in the name of Nazi racial ideology), scientists were quick to continue their search for apparent justification of individual human rights in a related mindset: one of a belief in a perceived need to safeguard the future of the human species at the expense of individual human rights.
Joshua Lederberg has been one of, if not the most important proponents of such mindset for most of the six decades between his 1958 Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine and his death in 2008.
Of course, Lederberg, who was Jewish, insisted that “thinking in terms of master races” must be avoided, as he stressed in a 1964 interview for the IBM “Think”-Magazine. However, a Symposium on “The Future of Man”, hosted two years earlier by the Ciba-Foundation in London, Lederberg, who presented on the “Biological Future of Man,” and his “peers” revealed in no uncertain terms that they themselves did see each other as an elite group of “masters.” A total of 6 Nobel Laureats (1937, 1946, 1953, 1958, 1960, 1962) were among the 26 participants. Even more than the contents of the papers they presented did the contributions they made in comment to each paper show how they felt not not only equipped but also under an obligation to, as Lederberg phrased it, “face the issue of a definition of man, taking full account of his psychosocial progeny.”
“The population explosion is one example of what can happen without planning and, as of now, there is no striking evidence that we have learned our lesson. We have policies for foreign aid, civil defense, television programming, advertising campaigns, and so on. But as far as the most important thing of all is concerned, what man himself is going to be, we have no policy (…) what should be stressed now is there is less time than you may think.”
Joshua Lederberg
Francis Crick, who at the time of the Symposium had just been awarded the 1962 Nobel Prize in Medicine a few weeks earlier, gives us an insight into his idea of Human Rights: Do people have the right to have children at all, he asks during the discussion of “Eugenics and Genetics” (on which Lederberg presented as well as Hermann Muller, Nobel Laureat of 1946).
“It would not be very difficult (…) for a government to put something into our food so that nobody could have children. Then possibly-and this is hypothetical-they could provide another chemical that would reverse the effect of the first, and only people licensed to bear children would be given this second chemical. This isn’t so wild that we need not discuss it. Is it the general feeling that people do have the right to have children? This is taken for granted because it is part of Christian ethics, but in terms of humanist ethics I do not see why people should have the right to have children. I think that if we can get across to people the idea that their children are not entirely their own business and that it is not a private matter, it would be an enormous step forward (emphasis added). If one did have a licensing scheme, the first child might be admitted on rather easy terms. If the parents were genetically unfavourable (emph. add.), they might be allowed to have only one child, or possibly two under certain special circumstances.”
Interestingly, from amongst his colleagues, Crick received pushback: “I think that it is no accident that the Nazi doctrines about sterilization were closely linked, intellectually and morally, to Nazi doctrines about genocide. That is why I am so alarmed to see what is happening today”, said Agricultural Economist C.G. Clark, adding: “Apparently we are beginning a second cycle of eugenic doctrines supported by some brilliant and misguided scientists, and which I am afraid will attract its quota of humbugs as well.”
Peter Medawar, author of a book about “The Uniqueness of the Individual” was also among the more cautionary voices: What frightens me about Muller and to some extent Huxley is their extreme self-confidence, their complete conviction not only that they know what ends are desirable but also that they know how to achieve them.”
However, Clark and Medawar were in the minority, as was reflected by Crick’s swift and harsh rebuttal: “I disagree strongly with Dr. Clark‘s remarks and with the standpoint from which he made them. It is clear that if we take the broad ethical question of ultimate ends we shall never reach any agreement. Moreover, those of us who are humanists have a great difficulty in that we are unable to formulate our ends as clearly as is possible for those of us who are Christians.”
The Scientific-Technological Elite
Joshua Lederberg was 37 years old when he attended the CIBA-Symposium. He went on to shape the landscape of science and the politics of science in the years to come. It is of note that he enjoyed the patronage of Oligarchs such as David Rockefeller, who included Lederberg in meetings of the Trilateral Commission. In 1978 he was elevated to President of the Rockefeller University, a position he held until 1990. Lederberg served as advisor “to a total of 9 White House administrations”. The first of these positions he assumed in 1957 under President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who four years later in his farewell-address warned of the danger of public policy “become the captive of a scientific-technological elite”. Lederberg has probably become the most prominent personification of this elite, and he managed to warn the U.S. Senate of the “Threat of Bioterrorism and the Spread of Infectious Disease” on September 5, 2001, just days before the attacks on New York City and the Pentagon.
Another member of the scientific-technological elite is Stanley A. Plotkin, the Godfather of Vaccines.
Whilst Lederberg has been a giant in the science of genetics, intoducing the idea of gene therapy already in 1963, Stanley Plotkin has been working his whole life on the development of vaccines. In 2009 Plotkin joined the scientific advisory board of Inovio Biomedicals in an effort to develop DNA vaccines. One year earlier, Plotkin’s work was used by
...
Friday, January 19, 2024
COVID Propaganda Roundup: Bioterror State = Equity™ BEN BARTEE JAN 18
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Monday, January 01, 2024
Mom yelled at me for getting something to eat.
As the year draws to a close, we at the Gold Institute continue to pause and reflect on our significant accomplishments of 2023. This year has been marked by our deep involvement in various influential activities and initiatives.
In the wake of the Covid pandemic's ongoing impact, we find ourselves facing challenges from aggressive, autocratic powers and international Islamist terrorism. Despite the West's cohesive stance on issues like Ukraine, complexities arise as some allies maintain nuanced ties with Russia and Iran. These situations highlight the critical need for our sustained efforts in fostering resilience, optimism, and pride in the West’s contributions to humanity. It is imperative to defend the West, our allies, and our values against both internal and external threats across multiple fronts.
Our challenges are both domestic and international. The emergence of "Wokeism" has evolved into an attack on Western history, values, and achievements. The agitational Left, spurred by misinformation from foreign adversaries, is creating divisions and undermining confidence in our democratic institutions, particularly among the youth. The Gold Institute for International Strategy is committed to defending Western ideals through a variety of channels, including articles, television broadcasts, seminars, and discussions.
In the Middle East, our fellows have been instrumental in transforming existing and new media outlets into highly accurate sources, thereby significantly expanding their readership and viewership.
Politically, the strategic alliances established by our esteemed legislative fellows are key in upholding conservative values worldwide. Our events in the U.S., Europe, and the Middle East showcase our capability to create meaningful connections with conservative entities globally. Academically, the Institute plays vital advisory roles with leading universities in the Middle East and Europe, enhancing collaboration and fostering academic partnerships.
Our work with Chinese dissidents, aiming to expose and counter Xi Jinping's and the CCP's global ambitions, reflects our dedication to opposing autocratic regimes. Our advocacy in the European Parliament for a shift in the European Institutions' approach towards China has been impactful. The EU’s recognition of the threat posed by China, as evident in the EU-China relations report, affirms our persistent efforts to address the challenges of the largest communist dictatorship.
Reflecting on these achievements, we acknowledge that our mission is ongoing. The support from individuals like yourself is crucial in addressing these pressing matters. Looking ahead to 2024, we aim to amplify our impact, forge new collaborations, and continue safeguarding the values fundamental to our societies.
We kindly ask for your continued support. Your contributions are vital to our research, education, and initiatives aimed at protecting the West and highlighting its positive global influence.
© 2023 Eli M. Gold
444 North Capitol Street NW, Suite 840
Washington, DC 20001
Two cheers for high modernism, the virtues and limits of high modernismVictim based identity politics, irony, pastiche, and cynical humor are played out
|
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
